CALL NOW: 1-877-735-8600

Consumer Rights Blog

Goode v. LexisNexis

Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Keesha GOODE and Victoria Goodman, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Plain-tiffs, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYT-ICS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 11–cv–2950–JD. June 26, 2012. James A. Francis, Erin Amanda Novak, Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C., PC, Irv

New Jersey Complaint Against ACXIOM Information Security Services for Reporting False Criminal Convictions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY  John Doe             Plaintiff,  v.   ACXIOM INFORMATION SECURITY SERVICES, INC.               Defendant. )))))) ) ) ) ) ) )  Civil   Action No.:     COMPLAINT   JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NON-ARBITRATION Preliminary Statement This is an action for damages brought by an

Pennsylvania Complaint Against Trans Union and Equifax for Falsely Reporting A Living Consumer as Deceased and Violating Consumer Rights Under FCRA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA                                                                                     Jane Doe                           Plaintiff,                                           )           Civil Action No.            vs.    TRANS UNION,  LLC                                          ) and                                                                            ) EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC )                                             Defendants.                )                                                      ______________________________                                                                                                   COMPLAINT I.     Preliminary Statement             1.         Defendants Trans Union LLC (Trans Union) and Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Equifax), two national consumer

Complaint Against Trans Union, Equifax for Reporting False, Inaccurate Credit History to Third Parties

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Doe                                                                )                                                                                     )                                               Plaintiff,                              )           Civil Action No.              vs.                                                                   )                                                                                                                                   )             TRANS UNION, LLC                                           )             and                                                                ) EQUIFAX INFORMATION                               ) SERVICES, LLC                                                    )                                                                                     )                                     Defendants.                        )                                                                                     )                                                                    COMPLAINT

Woman Buying Car Wrongly Flagged as Terrorist

When a woman went to buy a car, an alert came up on her account indicating that she was on a list of suspected terrorists after the dealership went to check her credit report. Her name was similar to a Colombian woman’s who was the actual suspect. What ensued was a long battle with the

Pennsylvania Complaint Against Allied Interstate, Inc. for FDCPA Violations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA  John and Jane Doe           Plaintiffs,                  v. ALLIED   INTERSTATE, INC.           Defendant.   ))))) ) ) )   Civil Action   No. 12-3795 Arbitration   AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action for damages brought by individual consumers,  against Defendant, Allied Interstate, Inc. for violations of the Fair

Memorandum re: Motion to Dismiss

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEESHA GOODE and VICTORIA GOODMAN, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., Defendant. <pCIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-2950-JD DuBOIS, J. • March 22, 2012 MEMORANDUM I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, plaintiffs allege

Motion to Dismiss in LexisNexis Class Action Denied

A class action lawsuit was brought by plaintiffs Keesha Goode and Victoria Goodman that claims LexisNexis classified certain retail workers as thieves in a database and distributed that information to current and prospective employers. The suit alleges that this practice was in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. LexisNexis made a motion to dismiss

Archives

Protecting Consumer Rights Nationwide for Over 27 Years

Expert legal advice, private consultation, no obligation
If you do have case, there is no out-of-pocket cost to you.