IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY , on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. INTER NATIONAL BANK and NETSPEND CORPORATION Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Does Plaintiffs, v. H&P Capital, Inc. Defendant. I. AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action for damages brought by individual consumers, against Defendant, H&P Capital, Inc., for Defendant’s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (hereafter
In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Jane Doe Plaintiff, v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT UNLAWFUL DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES I. INTRODUCTION This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer for Defendant’s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (hereafter the “FDCPA”) and
In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania John Doe Plaintiff, v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT I. Preliminary Statement 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendant for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter the “FCRA”),
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Jane Doe, Plaintiff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC and DELL Financial Services, a/k/a CIT Bank/DFS and World Financial Network National Bank, d/b/a Express Complaint I. Preliminary Statement 1. This is an action for damages brought by an
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania John Doe Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT I. Preliminary Statement This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter
MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, J. In its post-trial motion seeking a judgment of acquittal or a new trial, defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) challenges the jury verdict finding that it had negligently and willfully violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i (“FCRA”), when it failed to remove an erroneous collection account from
Cortez v. Trans Union, LLC, 08-2465 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Punitive Damages Verdict Against Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency for Misreporting Woman as Being on Government’s OFAC List—Finding Its Conduct “Reprehensible” Court Finds Credit Reporting Agencies Must Treat Government OFAC Data Same as Regular Credit Information Philadelphia, PA, August 17, 2010 On Friday,
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 08-2465 & 08-2466 _____________ SANDRA CORTEZ, Appellant in 08-2465 v. TRANS UNION, LLC SANDRA CORTEZ v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Appellant in 08-2466 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND SEISINT, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ______________________________________________________________________________ FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. DONOVAN SEARLES,
Expert legal advice, private consultation, no obligation
If you do have case, there is no out-of-pocket cost to you.