In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylania John Doe Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC Defendant. COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer, John Doe, against Trans Union, LLC for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereinafter the “FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681, et
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania John Doe Plaintiff, v. Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT I. Preliminary Statement This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter
MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, J. In its post-trial motion seeking a judgment of acquittal or a new trial, defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) challenges the jury verdict finding that it had negligently and willfully violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i (“FCRA”), when it failed to remove an erroneous collection account from
Cortez v. Trans Union, LLC, 08-2465 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Punitive Damages Verdict Against Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency for Misreporting Woman as Being on Government’s OFAC List—Finding Its Conduct “Reprehensible” Court Finds Credit Reporting Agencies Must Treat Government OFAC Data Same as Regular Credit Information Philadelphia, PA, August 17, 2010 On Friday,
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 08-2465 & 08-2466 _____________ SANDRA CORTEZ, Appellant in 08-2465 v. TRANS UNION, LLC SANDRA CORTEZ v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Appellant in 08-2466 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND SEISINT, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ______________________________________________________________________________ FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. DONOVAN SEARLES,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) Plaintiff, vs. ) ) EXPERIAN INFO. SOLUTIONS, INC., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC’S AND DEFENDANT ASSOCIATED CREDIT AND COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., and REED ELSEVIER, INC. Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND REED ELSEVIER, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff hereby respectfully responds in
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANNA ELIZABETH PIRES ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. vs. ) ) CHOICEPOINT SERVICES INC. ) ) and ) ) CHOICEPOINT INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT I. Preliminary Statement 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT SANDRA CORTEZ ) ) Appellant/ ) Cross-Appellee ) Nos. 08-2465, 08-2466 vs. ) ) TRANS UNION, LLC ) ) Appellee/ ) Cross-Appellant ) ) APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE SANDRA CORTEZ’S RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF In this third step brief, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Sandra Cortez (“Cortez”) hereby responds to Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s Trans Union, LLC’s (“TU”)
For over 27 years, our consumer law firm has represented individuals harmed by credit reporting errors, inaccurate background checks, identity theft, and other consumer rights violations.
Free, confidential case review. No out-of-pocket costs if we take your case.