Consumer Rights Blog

Brief in Opposition and Motion for Judgment in Case Against LexisNexis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND SEISINT, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ______________________________________________________________________________ FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. DONOVAN SEARLES,

Failure To Forward Consumer’s Dispute Documentation by Trans Union and ACCB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA   ) Plaintiff, vs. ) ) EXPERIAN INFO. SOLUTIONS, INC., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC’S AND DEFENDANT ASSOCIATED CREDIT AND COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff

FCRA Case Against LexisNexis for Selling Inaccurate Public Records Data

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., and REED ELSEVIER, INC. Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND REED ELSEVIER, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff hereby respectfully responds in

FCRA Violation Complaint Against Consumer Reporting Agency ChoicePoint

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA   ANNA ELIZABETH PIRES ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No.   vs. ) ) CHOICEPOINT SERVICES INC. ) )   and ) ) CHOICEPOINT INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT I.     Preliminary Statement 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the

Credit Reporting Agency Trans Union Selling Inaccurate OFAC Public Record

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT   SANDRA CORTEZ ) ) Appellant/ )   Cross-Appellee )   Nos. 08-2465, 08-2466 vs. ) ) TRANS UNION, LLC ) )   Appellee/ ) Cross-Appellant ) ) APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE SANDRA CORTEZ’S RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF In this third step brief, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Sandra Cortez (“Cortez”) hereby responds to Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s Trans Union, LLC’s (“TU”)

Bank Improperly Accessing Credit Reports for Power-of-Attorney Consumers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ Karen A. Barel, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C. A. No. 06-2372   ) v. ) ) CLASS ACTION Bank of America, ) )   Defendant. ) ____________________________________) ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of _____________, 2007, upon consideration of Defendant Bank of

Bank Imposing Improper Fees and Expiration Dates of Gift Cards

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. Land Title Building, 19th Floor 100 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19110 (215) 735-8600 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY   FREDERIC , on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. vs. ) ) VISA U.S.A., INC., )   and ) INTER NATIONAL BANK , ) and )

Sterling Testing Sytems Reporting Criminal Record Beyond 7 Years in Employment Report

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GARY SERRANO,                    ) on behalf of himself and all others             ) similarly situated,                    ) ) Plaintiff,              )    Civil Action No. 07-4563 vs.                             )

Archives

EXPERT LEGAL ADVICE – PRIVATE CONSULTATION – NO OBLIGATION