CALL NOW: 1-877-735-8600

Category: Uncategorized

Complaint Against Midland Credit for FDCPA Violations

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania  Jane Doe Plaintiff, v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. Defendant.   COMPLAINT UNLAWFUL DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES I.  INTRODUCTION This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer for Defendant’s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (hereafter the “FDCPA”) and

Complaint Against Big 3 Credit Reporting Agencies for Misreporting Collection Accounts with RJM Acquisition and HSBC

In The United States District Court For The Eastern District  of Pennsylvania  John Doe  Plaintiff, v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT   I.     Preliminary Statement 1.         This is an action for damages brought by an individual consumer against the Defendant for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (hereafter the “FCRA”),

Complaint Against Credit Agencies and Banks for Mixing Consumer’s Credit Files

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Jane Doe, Plaintiff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC and DELL Financial Services, a/k/a CIT Bank/DFS and World Financial Network National Bank, d/b/a Express                                                                                   Complaint I.     Preliminary Statement 1.         This is an action for damages brought by an

Brief in Opposition and Motion for Judgment in Case Against LexisNexis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND SEISINT, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ______________________________________________________________________________ FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. DONOVAN SEARLES,

FCRA Case Against LexisNexis for Selling Inaccurate Public Records Data

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., and REED ELSEVIER, INC. Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. AND REED ELSEVIER, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff hereby respectfully responds in

Bank Advance Notice Required for Varying Electronic Funds Withdrawal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA   GRACE LAWRENCE, ) on behalf of herself and all ) others similarly situated, )     )   Plaintiff ) C.A. No. 08-00679 vs. ) )   L.A. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ) CLASS ACTION   ) Defendant. ) )   PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER RESPONSE

Public Record Company Acting As A Credit Reporting Agency

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EDWIN A. Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., and REED ELSEVIER, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS LEXISNEXIS RISK &

Archives

Consumer Protection Attorneys Advocating for Your Rights Nationwide

Since 1998, our consumer law firm has represented individuals harmed by credit reporting errors, inaccurate background checks, identity theft, and other consumer rights violations.
Free, confidential case review. No out-of-pocket costs if we take your case.