OFAC Terrorist Alert Class Action

Ramirez v. Trans Union LLC

Among the many class action cases Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. has brought over the last decade, the case of Ramirez v. Trans Union LLC is one of the most consequential.

What is the case about?

When Sergio Ramirez tried to buy a car more than ten years ago, Trans Union LLC confused his identity with someone on the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) list. The OFAC list is a catalog of terrorists, money launderers, drug traffickers, and others subject to government sanctions. By law, Americans cannot do business with people or companies on this list.

Even though it was inaccurate, Trans Union’s false association prevented Ramirez from financing a car because the dealership could not risk the severe fines and even imprisonment for conducting business with someone on the OFAC list.

What are the claims in the case?

Ramirez and his lawyers at Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. filed a class action lawsuit against Trans Union claiming that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) because it had used a name-only matching procedure that did not consider such basic information as dates of birth, which would have clearly shown that Ramirez was not on the OFAC list. Moreover, when Ramirez asked Trans Union for his credit file, it did not tell him that the OFAC information was in his file as the FCRA requires.

What happened at the trial?

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified Ramirez’s case as a class action, finding that he was typical of over 8,100 other consumers.

In 2017, the case went to trial and Ramirez won the highest verdict for any case brought under the FCRA in history: $984.22 per class member in statutory damages and $6,353.08 per class member in punitive damages, a total of more than $60 million.

What happened on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?

After Trans Union appealed, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the jury’s eight-figure verdict against Trans Union and held that each of the class members had standing to sue Trans Union at trial, even when their credit reports were not sent to would-be lenders. The appellate court also ruled that the jury’s award of about $8 million in statutory damages to the class was proportionate to Trans Union’s offenses and reasonable in light of the evidence of those offenses. The court also reduced the jury’s original punitive damages award to about $32 million.

What happened to Trans Union’s appeal to the Supreme Court?

On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that only a portion of class members in Ramirez v. TransUnion, LLC had the right to sue in federal court. Although the jury found in favor of all 8,100 plus class members, and the trial and appellate courts agreed, the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that approximately 6,300 of the class members had no standing to recover their portion of the hard-won judgment. The case was returned to the lower court for further proceedings.

We are pleased that over 1,850 class members, including lead plaintiff Sergio Ramirez, had their rights vindicated. We are disappointed with the Court’s decision concerning the other 6,300 class members and are currently exploring available options to preserve their rights.

Want to learn more?

Are you a class member?

Call Us – 877-735-8600

Email UsOFAC@consumerlawfirm.com

Chat with Us – Use the window in the corner of your screen.

Schedule a call

Once you submit this form, a representative from the law firm of Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. will be in touch.

Best time to call(Required)
Best days to call(Required)

Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C.

PROTECTING CONSUMERS' RIGHTS NATIONWIDE

7,500+

CLIENTS HELPED

300 MILLION+

IN SETTLEMENTS AND VERDICTS

20+ YEARS

PROTECTING CONSUMERS

Awards & Recognition

EXPERT LEGAL ADVICE – PRIVATE CONSULTATION – NO OBLIGATION