CALL NOW: 1-877-735-8600 FREE CASE REVIEW
| Address | 20300 S. Vermont Ave., Ste 120 |
| City | Torrance |
| State | California |
| Zip Code | 90502-1338 |
| Address | P.O. Box 11029 |
| City | Carson |
| State | California |
| Zip Code | 90749 |
| Phone 1 | 888-459-0999 |
| Phone 2 | 310-273-9867 |
| Fax | 310-273-9867 |
| Addres | 800 W. Sam Houston Pkwy., Ste #200 |
| City | Houston |
| State | Texas |
| Zip Code | 77042 |
| Phone 1 | 866-834-6218 |
| Phone 2 | 866-354-3556 |
| Phone 3 | 713-579-7000 |
| Head Debt Collectors: | |
| Erica Lynn Brachfeld-Governing – CA Attorney at Law, Bar #180683 |
If you have been harassed by Meridian Management Solutions about the debts that you do not owe, call Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. immediately.
Credit report errors and false debts can be a problem for your personal and credit lives. You can be a victim of someone steals your personal credit card information and runs up charges in your name.
If you feel that your false debts are result of identity theft or debt collection company negligence, call Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C. at 877-735-8600 for a free case review.
We will fix all errors on your credit report, and may file a lawsuit against Meridian Management Solutions for your personal damages. We are here for you.
Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). Once notified that a consumer is now represented by an attorney, the collector’s communications with said consumer violated the FDCPA.
Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). Collector’s threat to report to a CRA any unpaid debt more than 45 days from date of placement without explanation of when the account was reported was a misleading misrepresentation in violation of FDCPA.
Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). A third party debt collector’s contact with consumers in the name of the original creditor was a false representation in violation of FDCPA.
Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). The debt collector’s initial communications with consumers in the name of the original creditor failed to contain the validation notice and was in violation of FDCPA.